I must admit that for a good number of years I used to be one of them. One of those folks who was, probably, well known as a die-hard, hardcore early adopter, always willing to try out new social software tools even way before they reached the beta status. Always on the bleeding edge of technology, hoping to pave the ground for when other folks my be coming on board of whatever the actual tool. Always enjoying staying ahead of the curve, providing constructive feedback on how to improve each of those tools to provide the best user experience possible, since most knowledge workers out there may not have been able to experience them well enough to start making heavy use of them so soon!
However, that all changed a bit a few months back, perhaps about a year and a half ago, when I decided it was a good time to make a stand and change the approach a little bit. Yes, I am still that hardcore early adopter, as I am sure a bunch of you folks out there, who know me personally, would be able to confirm. I still enjoy playing with multiple various social software tools to check out what they offer and see how they may help out improve my daily productivity. And that of others, too! The shift though came from the perspective where I am no longer jumping into the next new shiny object out there on the Social Networking space!
Yes, that’s right! For a good number of months now I have stopped jumping on board of plenty of the various social software tools available out there. Examples like Plurk, Jaiku, Pownce, BrightKite are just a few of them. I am sure you can come up with a whole bunch more of them! And I am not using them not because some of my connections may be using them, nor because they may not be interesting, on the contrary, I have played with them in the past, but they never made the cut for me to be moved into my production tools suite within the Social Software space. And while trying to explain why, I have always found it kind of difficult to detail why that happens.
Well, till today. Take a look into the wonderful blog post from Chris Brogan "Do What Works for You". This is one of those blog posts that, as I got busy reading through it, I just couldn’t help nodding on how simple its message is, yet how effective! So much so that I would consider it an essential reading for everyone who may be at whatever level of involvement with social software both in the consumer space, i.e. Web 2.0, as well as Enterprise 2.0. More than anything else because you would be able to find precious gems like this one:
"Welcome to the fishbowl. In here, we get a little bit too excited sometimes. We get zealous about the bleeding edge. We sometimes get tired of things before most of the rest of the Internet has even found it. And we often crave connections and meaning and value out of these shiny objects."
Or this other one, which is my very favourite one from the entire blog post and which I am really glad I will be quoting it over here, so that I may be able to help spread the message around it further on:
"But don’t let people tell you that you’re wrong for not liking something. Not into blogging? Swell. Don’t like Twitter? Fine. Hate podcasts? Perfect. It’s okay not to need/want/love the whole landscape. There are lots of services that people love that don’t fit my personal needs. I appreciate the services, but I’m not using them much.
If you’re here for business, for entertainment, to meet new friends, great. Do what works for you. […]" (Emphasis mine)
I couldn’t probably have put it in better words than those. Chris, with those couple of quotes, has just managed to split up in two different parts what plenty of folks have always been thinking, all along, would not be separate. Ever. Yes, he has managed to split "play with the tools" and "stick with those that make you more productive!" And has managed to do so successfully and without hurting anyone in the attempt. Or, like he better puts it as well later on in that same blog post:
"Learn what works. Try out lots of things. And then go with what you end up liking. No harm. No foul."
That statement, folks, is the one that would help you make the successful move and transition to adopting social computing and social software tools, both within the corporate world and beyond, and start enjoying some of the most interesting and exciting conversations. There is no need for you to spread thinner than whatever you may well be already; just because one or two of your connections are sending you invites to the next shiny object they are trying out, it doesn’t necessarily mean that you would be jumping next to try it out, too! It is ok to say that you pass that time around, that you are not very much interested on that specific new social tool, because it doesn’t fulfil specific needs, your needs; so at that present moment in time there is no reason for you to be there. It is ok to say to those connections that you are not going to spread thinner that time around and that you would wait for a little bit for their impressions to then perhaps start with the playing phase, once again.
I am not sure what you would think about this, but "Do What Works for You" is one of those blog posts that I can certainly relate to the most, specially after I started with this new motto of mine around giving up on e-mail, while at work. I still keep playing with various different social software tools, don’t take me wrong; normally, I try them out for a week or two (That’s the standard time that I recommend to folks as well), and then I re-evaluate the experience and confirm for myself whether the new social software tool would be incorporated into my own tools suite within the 2.0 space or whether I will still be playing some more or leave it alone for a while.
That, to me, has been the key to the success of having moved away from corporate e-mail and embrace social software tools instead. Yes, like I said, I keep playing with the tools for quite a bit to get a sense and a flavour of what’s coming up; yet, if you ask me how many of those social networking tools I get to use on a daily basis I could probably reduce that number to a handful of them that I am heavily using at the moment. Why? Because those are the main ones that do one specific job and they are very good at it: they help me boost my productivity and take it into new levels by helping me address issues / problems from my daily workflow and how I can address them with a 2.0 touch / flavour.
The rest are nice, but not my primary target. Such target is to stay productive by fixing the issues I may encounter on a daily basis and avoid splitting up myself thinner than ever before seeking that new shiny object. Sorry. This time around I pass…
And you? Are you doing what works for you?
Tags: Collaboration, Remote Collaboration, e-mail, email, Social Software, Social Networking, Social Media, Social Computing, Web 2.0, Enterprise 2.0, Innovation, Productivity, Conversations, Dialogue, Knowledge Sharing, KM, Knowledge Management, Collaboration 2.0, Communication, E-mail, Think, Re-purposing E-Mail, Early Adopter, Technology Adoption, Alpha, Beta, Plurk, Jaiku, Pownce, BrightKite, Twitter, Chris Brogan, Needs, Requirements, Solutions 2.0
I think I can die a happy man, now that you’ve written such nice things about my post. You’ll be happy to know that Michael Krigsman and I were talking about you tonight, so the love fest was bi-directional. Further, I’ll send you a message on some social platform so that I can ask you some questions for something unrelated.
I’m doing what works for me. : )
i quite agree with you, Luis. Actually, i write two blogs, one related to work, and another, general stuff … and have been contemplating for a long time to merge the two. just dont know how to. should i just stop writing on one? actually, i am finding, too, that i might be spreading myself too thin, logging into a number of apps, which is why, about the only sns i can be found on, is facebook! 🙂
guess you could say it works for me, so …